Afghanistan's Web Site: Afghanistan | Afghan HomepageHopefully Peace is coming to Afghanistan after 40 years of War
Web Site Home >
Forum Home Forum Home >Afghanistan News >Afghanistan News
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Please Register to have your voices heard. Silence will not make the world a better place!

US Peace Talks With Taliban Trip Over a Question

 Post Reply Post Reply
AfghanistanNews View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Afghanistan's Web Site News

Joined: 01-Jan-2011
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2188
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AfghanistanNews Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: US Peace Talks With Taliban Trip Over a Question
    Posted: 08-Mar-2019 at 2:25am
What Is Terrorism?

Nearly 11 days after peace negotiations between the United States and the Taliban began with high hopes, it has become clear that any resolution to the 18-year war could be frustratingly slow.

One of the most prominent issues thwarting progress is a disagreement over a fundamental question: What is terrorism, and who is a terrorist?

U.S. Peace Talks With Taliban Trip Over a Big Question: What Is Terrorism?

The answer is so important because the two sides had already agreed in principle on a framework for two crucial issues: the withdrawal of American troops, and a commitment that Afghan soil would not again be used to launch terrorist attacks against the United States and its allies, as Al Qaeda did with its strikes on Sept. 11, 2001. That attack led the Americans to invade Afghanistan in an effort to hunt down Al Qaeda's mastermind, Osama bin Laden.

The Taliban have said they would not allow Afghanistan to be used as a launching pad for international attacks. American negotiators have insisted on specifying that Afghanistan not be used by "terrorist" groups, but the Taliban have resisted, saying there was no universal definition of terrorism.

The Taliban dragging their feet on one term might seem to be killing time, but officials, including current and former Taliban members, said it was a sensitive and existential issue for the group. It strikes at the core of the ideological narrative around their 18-year fight. If Taliban leaders were seen as conceding on the issue, it could divide their fighters.

Both sides have remained tight-lipped about the latest round of talks, saying only that negotiations were continuing.

But interviews with current and former officials on all sides, who spoke privately because of the sensitive nature of the negotiations, said the talks have nearly collapsed on several occasions, with deep, and at times emotional, disagreements.

A senior American official close to the talks said that while a significant outcome at the end of this long round was still possible, just the two sides engaging in a forthright and substantive discussion on difficult details had already moved the process forward.

The Taliban, seizing on momentum on the battlefield, are clearly seeking to negotiate from a position of confidence against Americans facing a ticking clock, with President Trump's desire to withdraw obvious to all - including the Taliban.

The two sides began the latest round expecting disagreements over the timeline of an American troop withdrawal, as well as the Taliban's stubborn refusal to include the Afghan government in talks about the country's political future.

While the Americans have pushed for a gradual withdrawal over three years or longer, Taliban officials have said they want a withdrawal in less than a year, perhaps as soon as six months. The withdrawal would likely be tied to a cease-fire that would be rolled out gradually, with violence ceasing in an area as the pullout begins.

But the issue that has proved particularly nettlesome has been the American demand for guarantees that Afghanistan would not be used as a place to plan attacks against the United States.

While the Taliban condemned the 2001 attacks on the United States, its regime did not give in to the American ultimatums to surrender bin Laden. Instead the Taliban asked for evidence to be presented at an international court that the attacks were planned in Afghanistan. When the United States resorted to military action, the Taliban promised to resist it as aggression.

As frustrations over the definition of terrorism grew in the talks, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is briefed regularly by his negotiators, made clear he considers the Taliban themselves terrorists.

"I have a team on the ground right now trying to negotiate with the Taliban terrorists in Afghanistan, trying to find a way to achieve an Afghanistan that's not at war," he said.

Raising expectations around the latest talks was the presence for the first time of the Taliban deputy leader, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar. His involvement spurred hopes that the Taliban negotiating team could swiftly make decisions, rather than checking frequently with their leaders in Pakistan.

Source: The New York Times
Back to Top
Sponsored Links

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
" data-numposts="5">
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©1997-2018 Afghanistan's Web Site. All rights reserved

This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.

Golden Words By Khan Abdul Ghafar Khan (Bacha Khan)